Monday, December 17, 2012


By Ross Smith, for the Rimfire Review

The regular reminder that Christmas is imminent for NSW’s Public Housing tenants has arrived in their letterboxes as per ordained schedule, courtesy of their landlord. It takes the now standard form of dire threats of eviction if the rent is not paid on time and solicits payments in advance of the legislated timeframe.
This year Housing NSW has added a new tone to the Christmas message.
The new tone is introduced by the Minister’s words “It is very important that properties managed by Housing NSW are kept in good condition; tenants need to take responsibility for reporting any maintenance needs as soon as possible” then wanders through “Under your Residential Tenancy Agreement you have agreed to take good care of your home and report any property damage as soon as possible.” and winds up at “If you are found responsible for the damage and the debt for this is not repaid, action will be taken to terminate your tenancy”.
Unfortunately Housing NSW’s newest best friend, the Department of Financial Services, does not exhibit the same fervour for promptness and timeliness when it comes to honouring the obligations created under the same Residential Tenancy Agreement, especially maintenance obligations.
The NSW Attorney General has shown on multiple occasions that in NSW there is a long historic record of not spending on maintenance and thus allowing the housing stock to deteriorate. It looks like the Department of Financial Services is set to carry on this tradition.
A similar pattern of non-spending on maintenance for a short-term money saving was the subject of a scathing report by the Victorian Auditor-General earlier this year. The audit found the department’s deferral of maintenance meant that one in six public housing properties would be obsolete by 2016, and more than 65,000 public housing dwellings in Victoria had reached critical status.
Perhaps the regular reminder for NSW’s Public Housing tenants that Christmas is imminent should also be sent to the NSW Department of Financial Services bean-counters to draw their attention to the dangers posed to the state purse by fostering deliberate dereliction of housing stock.
Ross Smith



  1. you cant live in a 3 bedroom & want to exchange for a 2 bedroom people, its against housing rules. must be the same as what your in. sooo annoying

    1. The above statement is NOT TRUE.
      Every state has different rules on allocation and swapping.
      Circumstances change and extra babies are born and you need more space - then they grow up and move on and you need less space. You are allowed to APPLY for the house that suits your needs and Housing will decide if you qualify.
      That's why it is best to get Exchange Approval before listing.


Feel free to leave a comment. Maximum 100 words.

PLEASE ENTER YOUR NAME - just a first name will do, you don't have to register... but just write a name instead of "anonymous".

All comments are reviewed before publishing - if your comment is:
too long, contains foul language, contains names of DoH employees, or is simply irrelevant...

then expect your comment to DISAPPEAR INTO THE ETHER.
If you are not a tenant, then kindly declare it.

And remember - SpellChecker is your friend!!!